Skip to main content

Microsoft, Quo Vadis? You are the last one to the Party!

Salesforce acquires DemandWare. Lots has been written about the acquisition itself, so I will not comment on the fact itself. Instead I will ponder about implications on Microsoft.

After all Microsoft is the remaining of the big CRM players that does not have an ecommerce platform of its own.

Oracle acquired ATG in 2010.

SAP's engagement in ecommerce culminated in the 2013 acquisition of Hybris, after having Internet Sales Solutions since 1996 or so, keywords for the connoisseurs are ISA or WCEM (and I will not mention any R/3 transaction codes here ... ).

That leaves Microsoft.

All other players I would position in another league - which doesn't mean that they are bad solutions.

With ATG, Hybris, and Demandware the major independent platforms are taken, too; with the exception of Intershop, maybe. That is, if one assumes that IBM doesn't intend to sell off its Websphere.

Microsoft pursuing a cloud strategy with their own infrastructure doesn't increase the number of potential candidates, too. if Microsoft is interested at all, that is.

Demandware with its focus on retail would have been a good fit from an industry point of view and Paula Rosenblum from Retail Systems Research concludes that there has been a bidding war behind the scenes while Forbes pronounces the purchasing price as too high.

Microsoft Quo Vadis?

With Azure Microsoft has a strong platform and with Dynamics CRM a very competitive CRM system. Microsoft also has a strong ecosystem and a strong customer base.  They are also a long time ecosystem player.

But then they also acquire technology they need, if they perceive a gap in their offerings. Recent examples include AdxStudio and FieldOne.

Considering the rising need of Microsofts customers to have the ability of delivering seamless customer experiences/customer engagement there now is a visible gap in Microsofts offering. The gap being a missing input channel of data that feeds their AI that enables better engagement.

There are two Options

Well, actually there are three, but one can rule out that they build a strong ecommerce solution in a short time. Microsoft now has the choice of
  • pushing APIs or to
  • acquire an existing solution
They probably will do both.

While Esteban Kolsky in a brief discussion we had justifiedly asks why it matters in a platform business

I think that in an ecosystem both can happen and that there is a natural gravity towards the owner of the platform once there is momentum enough.

The $1,000 Questions: Whether? Who?

Well, of that I am not sure at all.
And I am not alone.

While Paul Greenberg doesn't know (yet)
Ray Wang wonders why Microsoft let SiteCore slip away (they purchased the Commerce Server and just got acquired by private equity firm EQT) and puts a cautious bet on Episerver.

Both of them are already deep in the Microsoft ecosystem, so technically would make good candidates.

Then there are the likes of Intershop and Magento, neither of them as integrated into the MS stack. there probably are some more candidates out there in the wild (e.g. OrckestraMartjacknopcommerceKentiko, ...). Most of these likely do not have the necessary scale and/or industry focus.

But this is all conjecture and Paul surely is right in saying that they will survive without an own ecommerce.

Exciting times.

What do you think?

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...