Skip to main content

How to get SAP and SAP Customers "Beyond CRM"

After my SAPCRM State of the Nation and Lightat the End of the Tunnel articles of earlier this year it is time again to have a look at what and how SAP is doing in the wider CRM arena. After all SAP also recently released its 1608 Hybris version, which in my eyes makes SAP very competitive again.

Let’s start with some facts, which I’d like to put into a bigger context:
  • SAP CRM 7.0 is in mainstream maintenance until end of 2025. This should give some relief to the existing customer base
  • SAP CRM (the on premise product) continues to receive only little investment; on the positive side this investment is very customer driven
  • At the same time CRM 7.0 is the only version that is not in customer specific maintenance; means it is the only version that still gets legal/regulatory and other updates
  • SAP’s CRM strategy ‘Beyond CRM’ has a strong focus on the Hybris line of products, which, I think, meanwhile is highly competitive
  • As an aside to the above points this situation makes the maintenance fee of 22 per cent for SAP CRM in combination with the suboptimal support appear very high
  • The user interface of the Hybris line of products is a lot sleeker than the UI of CRM 7.0
  • From a functionality point of view, especially looking into industry specific functionalities, CRM 7.0 still has an edge over the Hybris portfolio, with the possible exceptions of Retail as an industry and Hybris Marketing.
  • S/4HANA is getting pretty successful – this may be taken as conjecture, but people I trust confirm this; S/4HANA, however does not have a discernible CRM foot print that I am aware of – let us hold this thought for a while
  • SAP has a good number of on premise customers and I do think, cloud or not, this will continue to be the case – not only for SAP; let’s talk about that again in 2025 ;-)

What does all this mean for customers?

Well, that depends …

Let’s consider some scenarios.

You do not run CRM but want to change this

Do not forget to have a look at the Hybris line of products, especially if you are already an SAP customer. Ruling it out right from the beginning meanwhile is a mistake in any case. The Hybris line of products can compete with both Salesforce and Microsoft and, in the case of e-commerce also has a clear edge over both. Microsoft does not offer a strong e-commerce solution itself and Salesforce is likely to be busy integrating Demandware better into the suite of products.

You still use SAP CRM pre 7.0

This can only mean one of three things. Customer is happy with the solution and self-sustainable – or not using it at all. In these situations, one just needs to be sure that no maintenance fee is paid anymore. Check your contract and accounts.

If there happens to be a contract on customer specific maintenance because ongoing support is needed, my strong recommendation is to consider an upgrade or change of system.

In any case one should get out of customer specific maintenance; e.g. go third party maintenance, or contract experts in, if support is required. Any of these scenarios is less expensive than customer specific maintenance and offers a few, but differing, advantages.

Better go for an upgrade to CRM 7.0 or migrate to the Hybris line of products, if you cannot see yourself positioned in a self-sustained scenario! After an upgrade to CRM 7.0 you still could go third party maintenance, on an improved platform … but that is another story.

Of course, the decision for Hybris or CRM 7.0 needs to be carefully evaluated. SAP has a focus on Hybris, system integrators one on billable days. After all the decision boils down to what you need now and in 3 – 5 years. Preparation pays off.

You use CRM 7.0

Now this is where the fun starts. This scenario is where SAP gives least guidance. It is also the reason for this post …

Because there is no other way than considering the Hybris products if additional, modern functionality is required to improve the customer facing operations. On the other hand, this is pretty costly and may result in redundantly licensing/subscribing to overlapping functionality. This certainly needs to get checked and corresponding negotiations are likely to be easier if SAP is chosen as opposed to <name any competitor>. The good news is that the integration between CRM 7.0 and the Hybris line of products is improving a lot. The bad news, of course, is that integration is needed …

So, basically SAP is in the hot chair to provide vision and guidance for customers.

Two Scenarios for SAP to improve the Customer Situation

Let’s take up the thought I put on hold above. The ongoing need for integration between different SAP products and solutions is hard on customers as well as SAP.

And it is not really necessary. A micro services architecture on HANA can take care of that. Personally I would treat Hybris Commerce as a separate entity here but that may be up to debate.

Both approaches essentially boil down to fulfiling Hasso Plattner’s original vision of Business by Design. The technology is all there.

Scenario 1 – “S/4HANACRM”

CRM 7.0 already runs on HANA. S/4HANA is missing a CRM. So one could get the idea to modularize CRM’s object model more and to make it a part of S/4HANA. This also involves adopting the S/4HANA UI. Maybe strip out some of the marketing functionality and replace it with SAP Hybris Marketing. Over time do the same with other functionality, probably starting with merging the Hybris Service Engagement Center and Hybris into “S/4HANACRM” replacing the existing CIC. Continue with the balance of service sales functionality.

This could give a nearly immediate boost to S/4HANA, cover on premise, private- and public cloud scenarios, and, most importantly, provide existing on premise customers with a clear migration path, which is currently missing. There is also a richness of industry specific functionalities immediately available. On the flip side there still is the existence of different products that address the same potential customers. This needs to get managed. Technically I can imagine that the configuration initially is somewhat of a challenge due to different concepts.

Scenario 2 – “S/4HANAHYBRIS”

This approach basically works the other way round. Take the Hybris portfolio of CRM applications and merge them into S/4HANA. This emphasizes on the current strategy (although an overall rebranding might be in order) and should be less work as the Hybris suite should also be very close to a micro services architecture.

Following this approach would also help SAP to start from a cleaner code base with less legacy. The implementation of customer facing functionality would also follow an ‘important things first’ approach.

Industry specific integrated processes will come later, along with clearly defined migration paths, e.g. leveraging the Data Hub.

On the down side this approach might initially cause some not overly excited customers, if they do not get access to the good new functionality they need via the Hybris solution stack – at reasonable conditions.

Of course SAP might have a totally different view – but these are the most promising ways for SAP to approach ‘Beyond CRM’ that I see.


I actually would opt for the “S/4HANAHYBRIS” scenario.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sweet Transformation: Inside SugarCRM’s New Direction

Fresh from the 2025 SugarCRM Analyst Summit, waiting for my plane home, it is time to sort my thoughts. From Monday, 1/27 evening to Wednesday 1/29 in the morning we had some time jam packed with information and good conversations with SugarCRM execs, customers, and in between analysts. The main summit started with a bang, namely the announcement that industry icon Bob Stutz joins the SugarCRM board of directors , which is something that few of us, if any, had foreseen. This is exciting news.  With David Roberts , who succeeded Craig Charlton in September 2024, SugarCRM itself has a new CEO with a long time CRM pedigree.  As with every leadership change, this promises some change. Every new CEO evaluates what they see vs. where they want their company to go and then, together with the team, establishes and executes a plan to get there. Usually, this involves some change in the structure of the executive leadership team, too.  This is what happened and happens with SugarCR...
Post a Comment
Read more

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The CDP is dead – long live the CDP!

In the past few years, I have written about CDPs, what they are and what their value is – or rather can be. My definition of a CDP that I laid out in one of my column articles on CustomerThink is:  A Customer Data Platform is a software that creates persistent, unified customer records that enable business processes that have the customers’ interests and objectives in mind. It is a good thing that CDPs evolved from its origins of being a packaged software owned by marketers, serving marketers. Having looked at CDP’s as a band aid that fixes the proliferation of data silos that emerged for a number of reasons, I have ultimately come to the conclusion and am here to say that the customer data platform as an entity is increasingly becoming irrelevant – or in the typical marketing hyperbole – dead.  Why is that? There are mainly four reasons for it.  For one, many an application has its own CDP variant already embedded as part of enabling its core functionality. Any engageme...
Post a Comment
Read more

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...
Post a Comment
Read more