Skip to main content

SAP CRM into S/4HANA - Did SAP Hit Bulls Eye?

Did SAP hit Bulls Eye?
After having talked with Volker Hildebrand about the future of SAP CRM and whether or not there will be a CRM component in S/4HANA at CRM evolution 2017 I now had the chance to follow up with some folks back at SAP in Walldorf.

A little Recap

Volker told me that, unsurprisingly, SAP is working actively on adding CRM functionality into S/4HANA. In fact, they are merging SAP CRM into it. This is in my eyes meanwhile also the preferred of the two possible options; the other one would be marrying SAP Hybris C4C into S/4HANA. This is the approach which I originally preferred as it would lead to a cleaner code base. I changed my mind, putting customer friendliness reasons over technological cleanliness. The main advantages of merging SAP CRM into S4/HANA over SAP Hybris C4C are that this approach
a)    Opens a future roadmap for current SAP CRM customers that stretches beyond 2025. These customers else are at risk of defecting.
b)   Provides the continued chance for customers to run their SAP instance on-premise. According to Volker there are still a good number of customers that do not want to run their instance in the cloud. The key word here is choice.
c)    It simplifies the system landscape and its operation
And this approach works, in spite of SAP seemingly having numerous studies that lay out in detail that SAP CRM could never work as part of an ERP.

Now What is Going On?

As said, SAP is merging SAP CRM into S/4HANA. This will not be a simple merge but CRM will become and Add On to S/HANA.
This in itself is an interesting move, because this way it is not possible to continue using an existing SAP CRM in a standalone fashion. And there are some customers running SAP CRM without an ERP integration. I am still curious about the licensing impacts of this move. Some customers might not even have an SAP ERP, others might be too conservative to move on from SAP ERP to S/4HANA.

2017 – The Year of Service Functionality

The roadmap shows that SAP will start with delivering service functionality as part of this CRM add on, which makes sense as S/4HANA is sorely missing customer service as of now. This functionality shall have an RTC early 2018 based upon the S/4HANA 1709 release. While mainly relying on S/4HANA master data objects, as part of this S/4HANA will also benefit from the much stronger business partner that SAP CRM has, compared to ERP and the current S/4HANA.
There is some reluctance to commit to a precise scope at this time, just that it will be core service functionality mainly targeting shared services and utilities industries. As it seems there will not be major migration tools with this first release.

2018 will be the Year of Sales Functionality

2018 then is dedicated to delivering core sales functionality. Here we will again see a strong use of S/4HANA objects, with the exception of the flexible organizational model that CRM brings with it and a good number of CRM related objects that S/4HANA just doesn’t have, like leads, opportunities, territory, loyalty, to name but a few.
Order, configuration, pricing, and billing will be delivered by the S/4HANA core in a move that, at the outset, makes sense.
This year will also see the development of migration tools.

Is 2019 the Year of Marketing?

In brief: No. After the release of the sales core 2019 will see a focus on rounding off the sales and service functionality and the addition of loyalty management.
And with SAP Hybris Marketing SAP already has a marketing solution that can be used on premise and on demand.

How is SAP Doing It?

SAP is looking at the individual business objects and deciding individually which object to use, and how. Objects will get harmonized in order to avoid costly redundancies and to avoid CRM Middleware – which will remain, by the way.
Especially the highly normalized one-order model will get denormalized, using the existing index tables that got introduced to get some performance into the CRM Order model. This will also benefit the HANA DB which strongly prefers wide tables over joins. I am not fully clear about what that means when putting the S/4HANA order into the mix, though.

But What about the UI?

S/4HANA uses a Fiori UI. SAP CRM doesn’t. However, it is possible to make the CRM Web UI look similar to a Fiori UI. This will be augmented by delivering Fiori apps for overview pages and some selected native Fiori apps along with Fiori Launch Pad integration. I imagine this being similar to the current UI on SAP Hybris Marketing.

My Take

As said before I think that it is a good move to merge SAP CRM into S/4HANA. The sequence of objects for this mere also makes perfect sense although some customers would likely prefer a wider footprint right from the beginning. On the other hand there is no real pressure for them to migrate now. SAP continues support through 2025 and it is a good idea to continue benefitting from the stabilizing effect that the customer driven innovation strategy has and to wait until migration tools are there and working.
And companies that are contemplating to move to S/4HANA need to complete this migration first, anyways. Harmonizing the data models obviously means that a migration from SAP CRM to ‘S/4CRM’ is a migration project, for which a stable S/4HANA is a precondition.
What stays a concern for me is the positioning of ‘S/4CRM’ versus the SAP Hybris set of cloud solutions. There is a significant overlap in functionality. The messaging of when SAP recommends which solution really needs to be worked upon in order to avoid confusion. Grey zones must become minimal.
The answer seems to be there for Marketing, where there is only one solution going forward. But how about loyalty management (exists in CRM and as a cloud version), trade promotion management (exists only in CRM), retail execution (is mainly a cloud solution), or configuration and pricing? S/4HANA has the latter two and with the SAP Hybris Revenue Cloud there is another entry (although belated) into the CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) market.

An approach for solving this lies in distinguishing between systems of record and systems of engagement where slow-changing, mature functionality is concentrated in the S/4 world and faster moving engagement functionality is encapsulated in engines that could get deployed on site and on premise – or only be used on demand. Coupling systems of record and systems of engagement then could happen via micro services, but should happen on a platform- rather than application level to accommodate for machine learning abilities.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Siraj5 October 2017 at 23:55

    Hi Thomas,

    Thanks for sharing this wonderful and very informative blog. It is a brilliant move by SAP to include CRM into S/4 HANA core, but I have the same doubts concerning how SAP is going to position both Hybris C4C and S/4 CRM in the market.
    Also you have mentioned that CRM Middleware is going to stay alive - how could that be possible if CRM is already included in the S/4 HANA core. I believe getting rid of CRM Middleware should be the right approach, because I have seen so many great projects fail due to the replication issues between CRM and ERP.
    Any insights or clarification from you is greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Siraj

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sweet Transformation: Inside SugarCRM’s New Direction

Fresh from the 2025 SugarCRM Analyst Summit, waiting for my plane home, it is time to sort my thoughts. From Monday, 1/27 evening to Wednesday 1/29 in the morning we had some time jam packed with information and good conversations with SugarCRM execs, customers, and in between analysts. The main summit started with a bang, namely the announcement that industry icon Bob Stutz joins the SugarCRM board of directors , which is something that few of us, if any, had foreseen. This is exciting news.  With David Roberts , who succeeded Craig Charlton in September 2024, SugarCRM itself has a new CEO with a long time CRM pedigree.  As with every leadership change, this promises some change. Every new CEO evaluates what they see vs. where they want their company to go and then, together with the team, establishes and executes a plan to get there. Usually, this involves some change in the structure of the executive leadership team, too.  This is what happened and happens with SugarCR...
Post a Comment
Read more

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The CDP is dead – long live the CDP!

In the past few years, I have written about CDPs, what they are and what their value is – or rather can be. My definition of a CDP that I laid out in one of my column articles on CustomerThink is:  A Customer Data Platform is a software that creates persistent, unified customer records that enable business processes that have the customers’ interests and objectives in mind. It is a good thing that CDPs evolved from its origins of being a packaged software owned by marketers, serving marketers. Having looked at CDP’s as a band aid that fixes the proliferation of data silos that emerged for a number of reasons, I have ultimately come to the conclusion and am here to say that the customer data platform as an entity is increasingly becoming irrelevant – or in the typical marketing hyperbole – dead.  Why is that? There are mainly four reasons for it.  For one, many an application has its own CDP variant already embedded as part of enabling its core functionality. Any engageme...
Post a Comment
Read more

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...
Post a Comment
Read more