Skip to main content

Salesforce acquires Mulesoft - A Defensive Move

The News

On March 20, 2018 Salesforce announced the signature of a definitive agreement to acquire Mulesoft for a whopping 6.5 billion USD – whopping because the 2017 Mulesoft revenues have been at just $296.5 Million, albeit with a $1 billion target for 2021.
The press release states that “together, Salesforce and MuleSoft will accelerate customers’ digital transformations, enabling them to unlock data across legacy systems, cloud apps, and devices to make smarter, faster decisions and create highly differentiated, connected, customer experiences.”
Mulesoft is recognized by Gartner as a leader in the 2017 Enterprise Integration Platform as a Service Quadrant.

The Bigger Picture

As I have stated repeatedly before, most recently here, the enterprise software market is engaged in something that can be called a platform war. There are a few big players and some emergent players in the enterprise software market, and then we have a number of companies that come from the infrastructure side of the house.
Business applications get commoditized. Therefore the platform becomes crucial in a battle for dominance.
And it is not a given that there will be a dominance.
Looking at the 4 big software vendors, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, and SAP, they all have different legacies, strengths and weaknesses. They share one weakness, which is that their core business is in a mainly saturated enterprise market.
All of them want and need to play their strengths, while mitigating their weaknesses in order to become the dominant player.
Looking at Salesforce, one of its key strengths is the brand. Right or wrong, pretty much the first name that comes to mind when thinking CRM is … Salesforce. And sure, Salesforce builds good, sometimes even great, software, based on a strong business model. And where there is a need, the company is strong enough to buy leading players, like ten days ago Cloudcraze and now Mulesoft.
There are some weaknesses or risks, though:
·      Salesforce focuses on CRM, which might end up being a corner
·      It is hard for enterprise level companies to scale down to become more attractive to SMBs. Salesforce addresses this e.g. with Salesforce Essentials. Mulesoft can play a role here, too.
·      While Salesforce is profitable, it is not that profitable with an EPS of $0.26 according to the FY 2017 annual report. With a relatively high price point this is a risk factor. Salesforce battles this by staying a thought leader, delivering best-of-breed applications, and now strengthening its integration ability.
·      The many acquisitions need integration, so do seamlessly connected processes that digitally transforming companies require and demand. Here Mulesoft comes into the picture.
·      Last but not least, Salesforce is challenged getting at sufficient data to feed advanced machine learning models. Here Mulesoft will again play a role

My PoV and Analysis

This acquisition is a defensive move – a strong one, but still a defensive one. It fortifies the position while enabling Salesforce to address some of its challenges that I laid out above.
For Salesforce it is necessary, even mandatory, to be able to seamlessly integrate into the application systems of other vendors. CRM and the plethora of applications around, is not and never will be the core application any company on this planet runs. It is important, yes, but an ERP is more important.
Salesforce is not an ERP company.
Salesforce is closer to the saturated enterprise end of the market than to the underserved SMB end of the market.
Salesforce does not have the wide and powerful access to data that the core competition has. And data nowadays is truly King.
Salesforce has strong, very strong, competition.
Salesforce is clearly aware of all this.
And then it cannot be denied that currently there is a need to connect applications that live in different clouds.
Besides becoming the default plumbing between applications that are built on the Salesforce platform(s) and acquired applications that are not, Mulesoft can become the foundation for a platform of platforms that bolsters the claim of ease of integration.
The first three challenges above can clearly get addressed by Mulesoft. How big an opportunity (or threat, if this was a competitive bid) Salesforce sees can get estimated by the price the company is willing to pay.
But the main reason for the acquisition seems to be around the word data. In the words of Benioff: “Together, Salesforce and MuleSoft will enable customers to connect all of the information throughout their enterprise, across all public and privat clouds and data sources …”. This statement clearly not only addresses first party data but also third party data and hints into connecting to social media. Identity, profiles, and of course consents, are a main topic here. Will we see a CIAM acquisition next?
The company is clearly playing a combination of ‘best of integration’ with ‘best of breed’ game. The integration part ring fences the application part, while making them more attractive with its ability to dig into data.
And oh, it also helps with the price point.
Really, a strong move.
Strong enough?
Time will tell.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...
Post a Comment
Read more

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...
Post a Comment
Read more