Skip to main content

How to Thrive in the Age of the Customer


Returning from an interesting SAP Now event in Berlin with a strong attendee focus on customer experience is the perfect opportunity to start thinking about how to thrive as a company in the age of the customer. Being busy with and at our own valantic booth and an exciting IoT-Chatbot showcase I sincerely could not attend as many presentations as I wanted to.
First let’s establish what the age of the customer means.

What is the age of the customer?

A few years ago the term ‚the customer is in control’ was coined. This was back in the first hype around social media, around the same time the term ‚social CRM’ got created. Some companies, for example Microsoft, are still using it. In the beginning ‚the customer is in control’ referred to the idea that social media put customers in a far more powerful position vs. businesses, because the higher reach that social media offered, changed the balance of powers between customers and vendors.
Or so vendors of enterprise software argued.
The ‚customer being in control’ is certainly one way to describe an age of the customer, even a very strong one.
Forrester Research is somewhat more balanced. Forrester describes the age of the customer as the combination of a shift of power from institutions to customers and the disruptive forces of digitalization. This combination would “alter market fundamentals and force companies to change strategic direction and rethink operating models”.
As part of the vivid discussion following my post Ten Questions you always wanted to ask about CX on CustomerThink, Harley Manning, VP and Research Director covering customer experience at Forrester Research added some clarification. He stated that the change from analogue media (paper, rotary phone, etc.) to digital media allows customers to more easily compare products and services online. Manning describes this as a “POTENTIAL shift of power to consumers” (emphasis his). It, however, is part of the customer’s job to use the tools they have at hand. This is something they often do not do.
In addition, companies also do (and need to) react to changing circumstances. They do this in different ways.
As a consequence there is a continuous pendulum situation instead of equilibrium. Both parties, customers and vendors, are looking for their own advantage.
In the same thread I defined the age of the customer as a vision: The age of the customer is reached when companies are consistently adopting an outside-in view and define their success based upon making their customers successful. Additionally, there are equal powers of negotiation between customers and vendors and an information balance.
As this vision is not yet achieved, there is also lacking (mutual) trust. The result of this lack of trust is often a ‘battle of tools’. Every time one side invents a new method or tool, there is a counter-invention.

A mindset for the age of the customer

The way out could be very simple and is based on businesses applying the two concepts of a trustful exchange of value and an outside-in view.
I hear you saying that a purchase is an exchange of value. Glad you mentioned this. This observation is right, or rather, it can be right. The concepts of receiving value are vastly different between customers and businesses. For a customer value comes out of the ability to achieve the desired goal out of a purchase, for a business the value comes out of the transaction.
A customer can gauge the value she gets only in use, which means well after the transaction took place. In other words: The company received value (money) while the customer appreciates value in use. This value may accumulate to the purchasing price or not. As a consequence, customers need to show considerable trust in the vendor’s product or service.
The second concept evolves around answering the question what it is that the customer expects and then delivering something as close as possible to this. An important part of it is also being true to the own brand promise and the matching brand messaging.
The consequence is the need for a customer engagement strategy. As I, as well as several others, have written, engaged customers are the better customers. Numerous studies showed that experience has a measurable impact.
And experiences can only be delivered through engagements.

Taking Action

Necessary preconditions to successfully implementing the mindset necessary for thriving in the age of the customer are building up a brand image (brand experience) and a corporate culture with a messaging that consistently transports the desired brand image.
Once this is established, it is possible and necessary to look at the two concepts that help implementing the customer orientated mindset.

About value

As said above, customers need to exhibit a lot of trust into vendors. They need to trust that they will eventually accrue the value they paid for.
One key way business can earn and maintain this trust is by knowing their customer and continuously engaging with them in a way that is meaningful for the customer. That way, it is also possible to identify what customers actually consider as value. One thing is for sure, customers’ view at value is different from a business’s view.
Why is it important? Well, simply because it helps in fulfilling the higher order customer expectations and therefore building and increasing trust in the business.
However, an important rule needs to be observed here: Only ask for data that is related to the objective that the customer has in mind and only use it for purposes of helping the customer achieve this objective.

About customer expectations

Customer expectations can be divided into three layers, which also define their value to the customers. The mere execution of delivering to a requirement fulfils the base expectation and is not as valuable as also fulfilling higher level expectations.
·      Base expectations. These revolve around the fulfilment of the desire that a customer has, be it a need for information, service or an actual purchase. This is about reliability and accuracy and there is no prize to be won on this level. On the other hand, everything can be lost by not delivering on this level
·      Efficiency expectations. Efficiency is about making the fulfilment of the customer desire as frictionless as possible for the customer as it can be done, given the constraints that a business operates under. However, delivering to efficiency expectations becomes increasingly important. However, their fulfilment is still not sufficient to thrive in the age of the customer. But it is a mandatory precondition.
·      Joy expectations. These are the expectations that create loyal customers, if they are fulfilled. And these, together with any bad experiences, create individual experiences that remain. On the other hand, they can easily become base or efficiency expectations. That is also why they need to be used with judgement. However, it is important that the customers feel like they are treated as humans, by humans.
And that determines the way ahead. First be clear about your current situation, what you want to achieve and who the audience is. Then build your strategy, including matching KPIs that you can use to determine your progress along the way.
Implement it.
Measure your progress using the KPIs and adapt regularly.
Think big, act small.

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...