Skip to main content

Salesforce in Acquistion Talks with Slack - Good News or not?

The News

Today various media outlets broke the news that Salesforce is in advanced talks with Slack Technologies about a possible acquisition. The news had two effects: Slack stock went up nearly 40 per cent during trading hours while Salesforce stock loses out by 5 percent, which basically says that Salesforce investors are not so convinced about this acquisition being a good thing, whereas Slack investors clearly are.


Slack and Salesforce share an integration, which is listed on AppExchange since 2019.


There have been speculations on Slack being a good target for Salesforce that date back till August 2016, basically ever since the integration between Salesforce and Slack got announced.

The Bigger Picture

There are several aspects to this news.

Salesforce already has Chatter, a tool that often gets negative feedback. The company also owns Quip, which is essentially a solution for the collaborative creation of documents and spreadsheets.
 
And Salesforce has created work.com, as a solution to increase business resiliency and to improve collaborative work.

On a larger scale, and accelerated by the Covid crisis, the need for fast and efficient communication and collaboration of distributed work forces and their customers, using various means of communication is there. Actually, it has been there for quite some time, as the emergence of solutions from Slack to Teams, Zoom, etc. proves. E-mail is still very important, but only a part of this communication, which includes near instant chat, voice and video communications as well as collaborative work on documents – inside and outside an organization.

Another part is, that this communication needs to be tied to business processes and enable three things: Better outcomes by connecting all documents and communications to business processes and business objects, the ability to use this additional data to feed models that enable better predictions and/or actions and a reduction of efforts for the involved people, e.g. when it comes to finding information. 

Businesses have a challenge here and are looking for solutions to fix it, and fast. This can be seen by the revenues of Zoom nearly quadrupling between Q2/19 and Q2/20 or the usage of Microsoft Teams skyrocketing from 13 million daily active users in July 2019 to 75 million daily active users in April 2020. At the same time Slack grew its paying customers between February and July 2020 by more than 20 percent, too.

Because of this, vendors of CRM solutions have increasingly been strengthening their built-in collaboration and productivity suites or are forming partnerships with companies in this space.

My Analysis and PoV

My first reaction was: Wow!

Slack, coming out of the developer community, has been an early player in the communications tools space. It does not only allow chat, voice and video communication for (smaller) groups but also allows embedding of bots as well as workflows. The company is clearly loved by small companies and startups and has been able to get a substantial number of customers.

As the numbers above show, Slack has not been able to capitalize on the Covid crisis and grow as fast as the competition. Further, Slack has not yet become a profitable business and also has a negative cash flow. Especially Microsoft putting an increased focus on Teams, put Slack, as well as Zoom, under significant pressure, as there is a considerable benefit to use MS Teams in an environment that already uses MS Office. Given that, I think that Slack is in a tight position. I dare saying that Slack on its own would not have been viable for much longer.

When it comes to Salesforce, Slack makes for a terrific addition to its portfolio for various reasons. 

Slack enables Salesforce to significantly strengthen its productivity/collaboration suite, bringing it to a level that is no more far behind Microsoft. Productivity/collaboration is one of the four core pillars for a platform player. While Salesforce already has Chatter, this tool only works within a company and does also not allow for voice or video communication.

Neither Oracle nor SAP have a similar technology, although Oracle has its Beehive product that offers web and audio conferencing, plus a strategic partnership with Zoom, which it increasingly embeds into its CX suite. SAP has a strategic partnership with Microsoft and deployed MS Teams throughout its organization.

Slack also comes with far more than 100,000 customers and an expected revenue of in excess of $860 million in FY 2021, which would nicely add to Salesforce’s platform revenues, which in Q2 of FY21 rose to $1.2 bn.

In addition, the customers that Slack brings, are predominantly SMB businesses. In FY 20, less than 900 of 110,000 paying customers spent more than $100,000 for using Slacks services. This opens up a huge opportunity for Salesforce to tap into the SMB CRM market, which is a market that all big players are trying to scale down into. It remains to be seen in how far especially the smaller Slack customers accept a Salesforce that is seen as an enterprise player, as a partner.

In conclusion: For Salesforce, acquiring Slack makes perfect sense. It enriches the platform and therefore the Salesforce CX play. It is at least a jab against Microsoft and ringfences the Salesforce portfolio in the Clash of Titans with Oracle and SAP. 

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

LLM Showdown: Comparing ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok for Automated News Research

The analyst’s day is full of research. Now, this is the age of AI and AI is here to help, isn’t it? As everyone is talking about copilots and AI agents, why not using the tools at hand to do a little research on research. NB., no one really has a good definition of an AI agent, so this might become an additional topic for research. But I digress. Imagine the following project at hand, which is not only interesting for analysts, btw, but also for a variety of roles in the corporate world. Let’s call it vendor (competitor) monitoring. The job is the following: Research reputable sites for news about a number of vendors, relating to a set of keywords. Reputable sites are high quality news sites, high quality tech publications, high quality analyst sites and, of course the news pages of the vendors in question. Limit the time frame of the search matching to the cadence of my information requirement, e.g., “yesterday” for a daily update or “last week” for a weekly update. Provide a summary ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...