Skip to main content

Does Creatio create a new future for enterprise software?

Creatio cracks it open for us
The news

I had the pleasure of spending two days at the Creatio NoCode Days in the Ritz-Carlton in Orlando, together with customers, partners and some fellow analysts to learn about what is new and to generally learn more about Creatio itself.

The event itself showed a very vibrant community of customers and partners.

On topic, in a nutshell, the event was all about whether and how AI reshapes business software, its creation, deployment, use and the corresponding impact on a business’s ecosystem.

Creatio reiterated its four pillars of having AI at the core, AI being actionable, creating unified data through AI and offering a composable architecture, demonstrating this with four core agents, the marketing, sales, service, and studio twins, and how they help users become more efficient. Based on these pillars, Creatio enables customers to have fast turnaround times when implementing necessary changes. This drives a high user adoption and satisfaction plus a low total cost of ownership.

It also changes the role of the CIO and, equally crucial, of implementation partners. CIOs morph more into partners and advisors for the business units while implementation partners focus less on the actual implementation but on identifying the value of an implementation, therefore turning more into consultants.

There have been a multitude of customers and partners – on and off stage – who shared their experiences. Extreme ones include the functional replacement of a failed CRM implementation in a mere weekend and a seven thousand seat implementation with a 100 per cent user adoption that the company attributes to the flexibility of the system and the users’ ability to (within limits) adapt the system to their needs.

The bigger picture

The increasing popularity of no-code and low-code development environments combined with the advance of AI has the potential to dramatically change the world of business software. For several decades now the make or buy decision is in favor of buy because buying a prepackaged software is strongly supported by economies of scale.

Of course, the downside of this is that software regularly needs to be configured (i.e., adapted using tools that require no coding) or customized (including tools that require coding) to fully support business needs. Depending on functional gaps, this causes considerable implementation time and cost after buying or subscribing to the software. Configuring or customizing tasks regularly need to be performed by specialized people, external consultants or dedicated in-house personnel. This often causes slower than desired progress. None of this did really change in times of SaaS. Consequently, the time to value for customers is often still quite long. A positive side effect for vendors is that this tends to create a buyer lock-in while systems integrators can make tidy time and material revenues.

In come no-code and low-code development environments and business applications that are built and delivered on top of these platforms. This has two effects. First, it becomes fast to develop new business applications as limited or no technical knowledge at all are required. This leads to removing above mentioned bottleneck by broadening the pool of people that are able to build or adapt applications for business needs – the so-called citizen developer has been born. The impact of a no-code platform is even bigger if it gets delivered as a part of a business application, i.e., if the application itself is already built on it. 

Lastly, generative AI services can boost this effect a lot. Vibe coding is in everybody’s mind and some business leaders already predict a 100x productivity increase. Whether these predictions are spot-on or optimistic, a significant productivity increase will not only be seen in developing new applications but also in their adaptation to customer needs – the configuration and customizing process.

My analysis and point of view

Whoever I talked to during the event spoke about three things. 

  • Fast time to value

  • Low TCO

  • High user acceptance rate

So, Creatio is certainly up to something. One thing that contributes to this on the user side is the strong emphasis on making the interaction with the system follow human communication patterns, i.e., conversational, while being available where the user is instead of forcing users to work within the application frame. The other part is terminology. While every vendor, including Creatio positions its AI agents as helpers that take away onerous tasks, employees often see them as a threat rather than as helpers. Creatio addresses this by going a smart step further. The company names its agents “Twins”. This is a term that has far more positive connotations. A twin is not a threat but instead one’s best friend.

The second point is that we actually might be at a tipping point that flips the business applications playbook. For years vendors have made the point that it is far more efficient to deliver prebuilt software that works around “best practices” and is adapted to industry and customer needs when needed. Especially with cloud software, customizing capabilities were drastically reduced, compared to on premise solutions. One thought behind this is the avoidance of changes where a company is unlikely to have a differentiator. A mostly unacknowledged one is that maintenance is far easier for the vendors if customizability is limited.

As a result, the implementation of business applications became cumbersome, lengthy, and expensive. The combination of powerful no-code environments and generative AI has the potential to flip this calculation. If this flip happens, Creatio and a few select other vendors are uniquely positioned to take advantage of it. Evidence for this are a focus on the midmarket and the lower end of the enterprise market, an ecosystem that already now has understood that systems integrators need to offer high value services and turn into consultants and customers praising fast implementations and low TCO. Another indicator is the genuine care that Creatio exhibits for its customers. CEO Katherine Kosterova says that she wants to continuously “delight customers, no matter what”, but what Creatio really is doing is having its customers backs. This is effectively even better as it does not create the same vicious circle that the objective of “continuously delighting” customers does.

What remains is getting more attention. With events like the NoCode Days, working with analysts and showing successes, Creatio is on a good way here, too. The challenge remains to continue to send signal in an ocean of noise. 

And maybe the signal that the age of packages software is past its zenith is just that signal.


 

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...