Skip to main content

CRM is Dead! Yeah, right - and Earth is a Disk

A few days ago I came across a blog entry by @MikeBoysen titled Customers Don”t Want Relationships…PERIOD!

A really intriguing title and read – perhaps written to stir up a discussion. Works for me, as it stirs me up from of my absence from this blog of mine…

Mike, after this very strong claim the starts with another one: CRM is dead.

Well, CRM seems to be pretty alive for a dead one; as a strategy and also as a technology. And here is exactly the point where Mike and other influencers – I had discussions about this topic e.g. with @bob_thompson from CustomerThink as well – are dead wrong (I couldn’t resist this pun). Their argumentation is solely based upon CRM being a technology. And then they compare CRM with another acronym that they claim is a strategy, concluding that the other one is far better. Apples vs. pears. Technology vs strategy.

CRM is not a technology. It is also not a process area.

CRM is a strategy.

CEM is another, related, strategy.

Buying a technology without a strategy to implement is bound to fail. It is like entering a road without a destination in mind. This holds true for whatever acronym is used, including CRM, SCRM, or CEM, but also “Loyalty Management”, or “Social Media”, or “Big Data”. What do I need “Big Data” for? Or what is the purpose of doing “Social Media” in an enterprise context? Are customers loyal to a vendor or does a vendor simply manage to create the impression that he is better able to deliver to customers’ needs than other vendors?

“Big Data” mitigates our inability to know about what and how to collect and analyze data beforehand and thus enables us to decide faster and better based upon data. It is nothing without a strong ability to analyze data in order to prove or disprove hypotheses, to find the needle in the haystack. “Social Media” is a way of using more and other communication channels to interact with prospects and customers. And yes, it overlaps with “Big Data”. It also overlaps with “CRM” and “CEM”, and “Loyalty Management”.
“Loyalty Management” is a strategy to bind customers to a vendor. It will not work without delivery on promise and thus not without supporting CRM and CEM strategies. I would even go as far as saying that implementing a CRM strategy involves customer experience management, CEM.

The reasons for pursuing these (and other) strategies and implementing the corresponding processes and technologies should be the same (and I deliberately do not say “IS”): Increase the measurable success of the enterprise according to its key performance indicators by implementing a strategy using one or more technologies.

And, by the way: All these strategies are targeted towards customers getting involved into a relationship, whether they want a relationship or not; customers also might not perceive it as a relationship.

What is a relationship? There are at least two useful definitions that one retrieves googling “define:relationship”:

  • “The way in which two or more people or things are connected, or the state of being connected”
  • “The way in which two or more people or groups regard and behave towards each other”

Can we measure this? I think, yes; starting with simple behavioural metrics like RFM, (email-) subscriptions, opening rates, forwarding rates, campaign reactions – it tells a lot if a customer only buys the deals - but also using surveys, customer satisfaction scores including the not-so-liked net promoter score. Add into the mix the participation in forums and statements on social media, like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and the willingness to give away personal data (in return for better targeted offers or better prices, or…?) and the ever-increasing ability to perform sentiment analysis on what we are saying and writing.
This, together with a customer-oriented approach of delivering solutions to needs, and adapting over time, helps customers and thus the business.

Having said this CRM is by no means the only customer oriented strategy that businesses need to look at. The best solutions are of no or low value if the experience is not right – maybe a bad example here, but think of the perception that SAP is still struggling with.
tl;dr CRM is a strategy and is far from dead; customer relationships are measurable and whether we as customers like it or not, we are in a relationship with vendors. Vendors, on the other hand, cannot rely on systems as a panacea: They need to implement a set of customer oriented strategies including relationship management and experience management in order to be able to repeatedly help customers getting their job done (provide a solution to their problem).

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...