Skip to main content

Gartner Magic Quadrant on CEC - some Musings

The May 2016 version of Gartner's magic quadrant sees SAP in a challenger position, with the favourite competition Salesforce, Oracle and Microsoft being leaders - all of them dwarfed by the perceived strength of Salesforce.
Lets have a brief look into what Gartner thinks about these four companies.

Salesforce

Salesforce is again a clear leader in the quadrant, mainly based upon the fact that they have the best sold solution, which is probably due to sticking effects of their other successful products. This attracts partners and apparently has become a kind of virtuous circle although there are a good number of shortcomings:
  • The product is missing industry specific functionality but is 'fairly generic'
  • lack of master data management functionality, which needs to come in via other products
  • the new Lightning development environment and user interface is far from mainstream
  • it is expensive and raises concerns about vendor lock in, especially when there are other components, too
  • important functionalities like mobile chat, best next action, e-mail and multichannel interaction routing, feedback management are better done with partner software
Given these shortcomings and Gartner's statement that Salesforce is strong for simpler service models only (as opposed to complex ones) one asks oneself how Gartner would explain the margin of leadership that the Magic Quadrant shows ...

Microsoft

Microsoft has put quite some effort into their Dynamics CRM product. It has become a true suite and integrates well with the productivity suite. Recent additions have strengthened the service foot print. My assessment is that it is justified that Salesforce is scared of Microsoft - which is what I hear. On top of the good functionality that the product offers it is also the one with the best price. And then there is Microsofts vision and ability to connect companies, consumers, and content.
Still customers report weaknesses ranging from poor workflow capabilities, which should have been improved with the newest release, to scalability issues and poorly trained partner consultants, if they are available at all. And before I forget: Dynamics is a horizontal product. Industry specifics need to come from the partner side. These clearly are points that Jujhar Singh and his team need to address.

Oracle

Oracle seemingly reconfirmed their commitment to the CRM world and spends more on R&D again. With all the mature acquired functionality that Oracle commands, including RightNow and Siebel, in combination with Oracle's strong worldwide presence and big number of customers there are some arguments for having the Oracle CEC solution(s) in the leaders' quadrant, including the ability to model complex processes.
On the negative side the pricing model is complicated, and there are a variety of implementation- and upgrade problems. Customising is tricky and one needs a .Net client. And then there are issues with the take-up by the large SIs and consultancies as well as doubts about Oracles commitment to a partner ecosystem. 

SAP

The SAP CEC solution is in transition. There are two competing products, SAP CRM with very strong functionality and the new C4C/Hybris products, which are not yet that strong. The Hybris world is the future, however, not yet really seen. As I myself have written and stated a number of times SAP's messaging is confusing at best.
In essence SAP sells a vision with its turn from on premise to first C4C, then Hybris/YaaS. This vision still needs to get proven while the lacking commitment to SAP CRM makes this product fall behind the pack although this is the product that is very strong in complex processes - and with a little help of the on-demand sisters can also do very well with social media. Field Service, self services, and analytics are a given at SAP.

Famous last Words

Although I cannot really understand the margin by which Gartner sees Salesforce lead the pack there is a very strong product. Personally I do see more scope in Microsoft, especially if they could decide to include industry specific functionality, especially considering the B2C side. When SAP finally gets their act sorted on the Hybris platform we will see a formidable player re-emerge here, too. In order to get this communicated proudly into the market I would see a need to engage better with the likes of Gartner again. Add influencers like Paul Greenberg. Bob Stutz successfully improved analyst and influencer perception of SAP CRM - which decreased again with him leaving. Here at least Microsoft and Salesforce have a huge advantage.

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...