Skip to main content

Quo Vadis, SAP?

For quite some time the SAP CX community asks itself where SAP is going, or more precisely, which direction its Customer Experience portfolio is taking.

This is a worrisome question, particularly as the larger CRM market is estimated to be the biggest segment of the enterprise software market since 2018; and since SAP is positioned with a number of strong solutions, partly home-grown and partly acquired. Hybris, Gigya, CallidusCloud, Qualtrics are only the shiniest catches of the acquisition spree that SAP took under Bill McDermott’s leadership.

In September 2015 SAP announced that it set out to build an integrated suite of front office solutions, which the company declared delivered during SAPPHIRE 2018, which also marked the birth of the ‘intelligent enterprise’. These two announcements can basically be summed up as take the CRM market from its strength on the ERP and supply chain side.

In between, SAP imported important parts of its CRM 7 solution into its new S/4HANA solution

At that time, SAP has essentially turned into a serious player on the CRM market.

Which is an impression that got fortified by Bob Stutz joining SAP to lead the Customer Experience team in October 2019. I mean, there is no software exec who is more successful in shaping and driving CRM – with the possible exception of Mark Benioff. Bob, in turn, with Esteban Kolsky, convinced one of the smartest CRM analysts around to become his head of strategy.

What could go wrong?

Fast forward to June 2020

Bob Stutz holds his position for about 8 months. Jennifer Morgan, so far Co-CEO with Christian Klein, left SAP. The executive board was restructured and is now younger than ever before – and more Walldorf and product centric than it has been in a long time.

Published Customer Experience suite roadmaps have been far in between and/or are hard to find. A webinar on SAP Customer Experience solutions, their strategy and roadmap, that was planned for May 8, 2020, got cancelled.

The most important event of the SAP calendar is the annual SAPPHIRE conference. As a consequence of the Covid pandemic, this conference was quickly turned into an online event. If you are interested in how it was perceived, you can read a great post by Paul Greenberg and another one by Sven Esser.

Things “ERP” – lacking a better word

In the keynotes SAP executives formulated a very clear picture of the path that SAP will be following in the next years. It revolves around three keywords:

-       Sustainability

-       Profitability

-       Resilience

and builds upon the great story of the intelligent enterprise. Business resilience is, of course, something that needs to be achieved. This becomes even more obvious in the light of a pandemic that shattered supply chains and made working collaboration tools crucial. But more about this in a minute. Let me first touch the other two terms.

They appear totally unrelated.

But they are not.

Let me explain this using a little detour.

For years now we are living with a growing world population, consumption that exceeds production capacity in many countries, lots of waste, and, worst of all, use of energy that largely bases on fossil resources. The most visible consequence is a contribution to the global warming effect that gets questioned by some people, but that nevertheless exists. This is unsustainable, is addressed in several climate agreements and created widely visible movements like Fridays for Future. The goal is sustainability.

On the other hand we have business leaders crying murder that investing in sustainable production processes would cull their profitability – and in conclusion being unsustainable for their businesses.

SAP’s placing these two words, sustainability and profitability, in one single sentence (and what is more: twice) is a bold contradiction to these leaders’ statements. It is possible and, in extension, SAP has the solutions to help achieving this goal.

Resilience and SAP is a far easier combination. With its suite of back end and process modelling solutions, plus advanced analytics and Ariba, the company is uniquely able to help companies building an ecosystem that is resilient against this type of events.

And this is where the evolved story of the intelligent enterprise becomes really interesting.

Because it is no more a story about single enterprises but whole value chains, ultimately whole economies becoming intelligent. This is also where sustainability comes into the picture again.

A few years ago, Microsoft spoke of becoming the fabric of the enterprise. The enabler that connects its parts and powers efficient processing. SAP takes this two dimensions further by envisioning its software driving intelligent economies, making them sustainable and resilient.

This is a bold and powerful vision.

Things Customer Experience

But where does SAP’s Customer Experience unit fit into this vision? Sure, one company’s supply side is the demand side of the other, but that is somewhat short, given that the CRM market is huge.

People like me, who expected Customer Experience announcements being made during SAPPHIRENOW, got disappointed. There was nary a word about Customer Experience. On the contrary, there even have been two streams: Customer Experience and Experience Management, the latter seemingly revolving around user experience and Qualtrics.

So, for the outside world, the strong focus on customer experience that got announced in 2018 seems to be a thing of the past. Bob Stutz knows what he wants to achieve and surely does have a strategy. Him not having announced a strategy yet, seems to indicate some disagreement about the right way in the (extended) board. The fact that an announcement via the DSAG (German SAP User Group) about a roadmap and strategy got cancelled on short notice probably has a reason in board changes that happened shortly before. Which in turn would hint at some disagreements about how to position the Customer Experience unit in the context of S/4HANA and the Customer Experience Suite (fka C/4HANA) being part of Jennifer Morgan’s demise.

So, there is not much official news – which is bad news.

On the other hand, and that is increasing my (already high) confidence in SAP, I hear a lot about how incredibly busy the development teams are. And this from different sides. It is also obvious how much effort it takes to integrate the acquired software into some harmonic one.

My take

SAP customers that are looking for a replacement of their old but still well functional CRM 7 solution, are confused to worried, although the maintenance window of the business suite has been expanded through 2027. They are looking for more guidance and, if they do not get it, are at risk of choosing another vendor, although this regularly is not beneficial as, with all its challenges, an SAP-to-SAP integration is the simplest possible one, pricing is usually not worse than the competition’s, and as the SAP CX suite is competitive.

And with the inclusion of the core sales and service functionality of the old CRM 7 solution into S/4HANA, SAP has quite an asset that could help fending off the competition, if used more actively.

Some suggestions

The single most important helper for its customer base is a formulated strategy that the customers can subscribe to. While the roadmap explorer lists a number of improvements that will come in the next quarters, this needs to be brought into more of a context, especially into the context of the intelligent enterprise. This is likely going to happen with a series of web events that are planned to start on July 7.

SAP usually is very strong in formulating what will be important in 2 years and beyond. Adding an increased delivery to short term needs to this strength would even increase the strength of SAPs position by increasing its attractiveness in the short term.

The integration of the various acquisitions of the past years into the SAP-developed parts has already been taken up as a priority. The importance of a seamless integration of data and process cannot be overstated. This includes the integration of the CX suite into the back end, which is already on a pretty good state, although integration is and stays one of the cost drivers of projects. The cost of this integration can be greatly reduced when using one common (logical) data model across applications, like the SAP One Domain model.

Especially for new customers, a core CRM as an integral part of an ERP solution is a strong asset. This is especially true for the sales automation parts of CRM, as most companies tend to start with the sales side of their processes. Having a good enough support for these processes as part of their ERP solution would greatly reduce their need to implement another CRM system. With core parts of CRM 7 being part of S/4HANA SAP has a this asset. Although investments rightly need to stay limited to not interfere with the CX suite, it would be a strong move to use it.

Will we see this implemented? Maybe partly.

Still, I am excited to see where SAP is heading with its strong narrative of the intelligent enterprise, and how the CX suite fits into it to make it even stronger.

Interesting times ahead.

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

LLM Showdown: Comparing ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok for Automated News Research

The analyst’s day is full of research. Now, this is the age of AI and AI is here to help, isn’t it? As everyone is talking about copilots and AI agents, why not using the tools at hand to do a little research on research. NB., no one really has a good definition of an AI agent, so this might become an additional topic for research. But I digress. Imagine the following project at hand, which is not only interesting for analysts, btw, but also for a variety of roles in the corporate world. Let’s call it vendor (competitor) monitoring. The job is the following: Research reputable sites for news about a number of vendors, relating to a set of keywords. Reputable sites are high quality news sites, high quality tech publications, high quality analyst sites and, of course the news pages of the vendors in question. Limit the time frame of the search matching to the cadence of my information requirement, e.g., “yesterday” for a daily update or “last week” for a weekly update. Provide a summary ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...