Skip to main content

CRM, CX and Customer Engagement - three humble wishes to better the industry

a cyberpunk style crm guy has wishes for better customer experience by Thomas Wieberneit with Dall-E
The CRM Playaz asked me about my take on CRM for 2023. Of course, I happily supplied an answer …

So, here we are. CRM in terms of concept and software is quite mature, after all it is around for quite some time. It went through some iterations and spun out into other areas, being more transactionally focused, instead of engagement focused. This led to the creation of more software categories, termed customer engagement management or, more recently, customer experience management. This had the potential to create misconceptions and ambiguities, especially when all three categories, customer relationship management, customer engagement and customer experience are looked at. There is confusion across these terms – as there are no generally accepted definitions around – and there is even confusion when looking at the terms individually.

That made me express three wishes and advice, one for customer relationship management, one for customer experience, and one for customer engagement.

TL;DR – if you do not want to read, here is the video that I created.


Let’s start with CRM

CRM stands for customer relationship management. I do not want to dive into the discussion about whether there is too much focus on the M and not enough on the R. This is certainly worth a discussion of its own. Instead, let me share the observation that, sadly, CRM is far too often used when actually SFA – sales force automation is meant. This is a limited view on CRM that has been introduced mainly by vendors that focus on enabling sales forces and that has gained far too much traction.

Customer relationship management, as a strategy, as a discipline, supported by technology, covers all aspects of marketing, sales, and service. In brief, it supports and enables all customer facing functions. It is therefore so much more than just SFA, sales force automation. This is true, even if only a sales oriented implementation is done. Limiting one’s thinking of CRM to sales force automation is a surefire approach to missing out on a lot of possibilities to improve the life of non-sales customer facing staff.

My wish is to not limit customer relationship management to SFA to enable us to be able to leverage all the possibilities that CRM offers.

Continuing with CX

CX stands for customer experience. It is also the acronym that is used to name a software category. Let us be clear: there is at most one person on the planet – in the universe – who is in charge of their own experience. Yes, the person that actually has an experience. In terms of businesses, this is the customer. The actual experience will differ with the person, with gender, cultural background, education, etc. And for any person, this experience may also very well be different day by day, it might even differ with the time of the day. There is so much context involved in this.

A software system cannot deliver an experience. There is no system of experience whatsoever. A software system can only enable an experience, by being used to engage with the customer with the intent of the customer having a desired experience.

My wish is for both, software vendors and -buyers to not talk of creating experiences but to think about how to successfully use software systems for what they are intended: customer engagement.

Which brings me to CE – customer engagement

Customer engagement is a bi-directional process. And as a company or an organization you have only one side under a semblance of control: your own side. You cannot control how the customer acts or reacts and how the customer engages with you. You as a business can only offer the ways and means, from which the customer does choose. This choice that your organization offers has an impact on how the customer experience’s the interaction with your organization, btw.

As customer engagement is bi-directional with one half of the process being out of a business’ control, businesses must not consider their own objectives as the reason for the engagement. Instead, they rather need to look at achieving their own objectives as a consequence of the customers achieving theirs. The reason for every engagement, every step in it, is fulfilling a customer need, thereby making the customer successful. A customer who consistently fulfils their needs successfully with the help of a company is a happy customer. Happy customers return.

My wish is that businesses, their managers and employees, understand their success as being a consequence of the success of their customers. Creating happy, satisfied customers is the objective, not the means to become successful oneself.

In this sense I wish everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous year 2023. 

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

Data Wars: SAP Vs. Salesforce In The AI-Driven Enterprise Future

The past weeks certainly brought a lot of news, with SAP Sapphire and Salesforce's surely strategically timed announcement of acquiring Informatica , ranging at the top. I have covered both in recent articles. The enterprise software landscape is crackling with energy, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is certainly the star of the show. It isn't anymore about AI as a mere feature; it's about AI as the strategic core of enterprise software. Two recent announcements underscored this shift: SAP's ambitious AI-centric vision that was unveiled at its Sapphire 2025 conference, and, arriving hot on its heels, Salesforce's agreement to acquire data management titan Informatica for $8 billion. Both signal an intensified battle for AI supremacy, where trusted, enterprise-wide data is the undisputed new monarch. Of course, SAP and Salesforce are not the only ones duking this one out. SAP's Sapphire Vision: An AI-Powered, Integrated Enterprise At its Sapphire 2025 event in ...

CPQ, Meet Price Optimization: Your Revenue Lifecycle Just Got Serious

The news On October 1, 2025, Conga announced its intent to acquire the B2B business of PROS , following PRO’s acquisition by Thomas Bravo . At the same time, ThomaBravo and PROS announced that PRO’s travel business segment will be run as a standalone business . The bigger picture Revenue operations, revenue management and revenue lifecycle management have become a thing in the past years, as evidenced by the number of specialized companies that solve parts of the overall problem of optimizing revenue. It also got abused to some extent (e.g., surge pricing models) when the users of the corresponding capabilities consider optimizing being the same as maximizing. Reality check: It is not. While optimizing involves a bit of identifying how much a customer is willing to pay, it also involves the thought of repeat business, or in other words customer loyalty, even without a formal loyalty program. And that involves the customer experience, part of which the speed of creating a quote with mat...