Skip to main content

Creatio Bets $300M on Bank.AI: Pega, Your Move

Creatio Bets $300M on Bank.AI: Pega, Your Move; image by TW with some help from Claude and ChatGPT
Creatio commits $300 million through 2028 to its banking offering, sharpening its challenger position against Pega and the CRM majors in regional banking.

The News

On September 22, 2026, Creatio announced a $300 million investment in Creatio Bank.AI, its offering for banks and financial institutions, to be spent from 2026 through 2028. Creatio describes itself as an AI CRM and workflow platform where people and AI agents work together.

The release names two investment areas. The first is product and AI development: pre-built banking agents across three domains Creatio calls Growth, Service and Operations, plus continued work on AI Studio, covering no-code agent design, centralized AI governance, integrations, security and observability. The second is AI adoption and enablement: training programs, AI accelerator workshops, industry-specific guidance and expanded channel delivery capabilities for implementation partners.

Creatio states that its financial services vertical grew 48% year over year. The release does not specify the metric, the period or the base. It lists Nasdaq, First National Bank of Pennsylvania, Metro Bank, MetLife, CEC Bank, OTP Bank, National Bank of Panama and ESL Credit Union among organizations with which Creatio has long-standing relationships.

The investment is framed as part of Creatio's Unlimited Enterprise model, which the company introduced earlier as pricing without limits on users, agents, workflows or applications. Creatio also points to its recently launched Bank.AI hub, a digital event on September 24 and a Bank.AI Summit in Chicago on October 27.

The Bigger Picture

Banking is moving from AI pilots to AI in production, and the software market is reorganizing around that shift. At the same time, the industry is changing fast, from increasingly demanding industry specific solutions, via AI moving more and more into operations and finally an uncertainty about pricing models for agents, as seat-based pricing seems increasingly inadequate.

Horizontal CRM and workflow vendors are packaging industry-specific agents rather than leaving banks to assemble them from generic building blocks. Salesforce markets Agentforce for Financial Services on top of Financial Services Cloud, Microsoft positions Dynamics 365 alongside its financial services offerings, and Pega extends its decisioning and case management into agentic workflows. Already in 2025, Forrester observed in its financial services CRM research that vendors are splitting into two camps: those deepening industry-specific capabilities and those retreating to industry-agnostic AI building blocks. Creatio sits firmly in the first camp, as does e.g., BusinessNext.

Then, there is the move of AI from the front office into operations. As in other areas, early banking AI focused on customer-facing assistants and advisor productivity. The current wave targets compliance, regulatory reporting, lending and back-office processing, where volumes are high and the cost of error is even higher. That brings regulation to the center of the buying decision. The EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act DORA is in force since January 2025, the EU AI Act classifies credit scoring as high-risk, and model risk management disciplines apply to AI agents as they do to any other model. In this territory, workflow and low-code vendors such as Appian, OutSystems and ServiceNow compete alongside CRM vendors and core banking providers such as Temenos, FIS, Fiserv and Jack Henry. These own the system of record and are adding AI capabilities of their own.

Last, but not least, there is pricing. As agents take on work previously done by people, seat licensing increasingly becomes meaningless. Instead, different pricing models emerge, from consumption-based models to value-based models and flat pricing. All of them have their own challenges. Salesforce and Microsoft have already moved AI toward consumption-based pricing. Creatio's Unlimited Enterprise model goes the other way, removing caps on users, agents and workflows.

My Analysis and Point of View

Creatio is spending where its constraints are, and that makes this an interesting challenger move. In banking, its product has rarely been the limiting factor. Partner delivery capacity and vertical credibility have. An investment that funds pre-built banking agents alongside partner enablement and delivery addresses both, and it builds on the alliances with Deloitte Digital and Accenture that Creatio announced with its 2024 results.

The competitive logic becomes clearest against Pega. Pega's strength lies in tier-1 banks that can fund long, partner-heavy programs around decisioning and case management. Creatio's named customers are predominantly regional and mid-tier banks and credit unions, for whom pre-built agents, no-code configuration and pricing that does not meter adoption are a very good alternative to a program sized for a global bank. Pega and Creatio will meet head on in the Operations domain, where compliance, regulatory reporting and back-office work sit. That is also where production references will count for more than any agent catalog, and where Creatio will need to show named banks running its agents under a bank's model risk regime.

Pricing may prove the sharper edge. I have said it before, consumption models disassociate value generation from cost and make life easy for the vendors. While many other vendors including Salesforce and Microsoft push AI toward consumption, a predictable bill is a strong argument in a regulated, budget-conscious industry. The open question is who absorbs the inference cost once agent volumes reach banking scale. If Unlimited Enterprise holds without restrictive fair-use terms, it becomes a lasting wedge. If it needs fine print, its appeal narrows.

The numbers in the release deserve some scrutiny, too. They reveal more than just the strategy. According to Creatio, its financial services vertical grew 48% year over year. No doubt, this is a very good number, but it gives no base and no indication of the share of revenue it represents. For 2025, Creatio reported 60% topline growth for the same vertical. Given this, the new figure of 48% could point to slower growth, a larger base, or both. It also includes insurance, which Bank.AI does not target, so it says less about the banking business than it may appear. The $300 million comes without a split between product, enablement and marketing, or a baseline showing how much of it is incremental spend. None of this undermines the direction; however, it makes the interpretation of these numbers somewhat hard. Having said this, an investment of this magnitude shows a focus and is prone to give Creatio’s banking business a push, if the company continues to execute well.

The coming quarters will show whether this turns out to be a successful strategy or just impressive numbers in an announcement. Named operations-agent customers with measurable outcomes, ideally presented at the Chicago Bank.AI summit at the end of October, a disclosed base for the growth figure, and published fair-use terms for Unlimited Enterprise would each strengthen the case. If they arrive, Creatio's position in the banking sector strengthens significantly, and Pega will have a more visible challenger in the segment below its core. Capable Creatio is, without a doubt. Ambitious, too.



 

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

You are only as good as your customer remembers

As you know, I am very interested in how organizations are using business applications, which problems they do address, and how they review their success. In a next instance of these customer interviews, I had the opportunity to talk with Melissa Gordon , Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions at Tidal Basin about their journey with Zoho. You can watch the full interview on YouTube. Tidal Basin is a government contractor that provides various services throughout the government space, including disaster response, technology and financial services, and contact centers. Tidal Basin started with Zoho CRM and was searching for a project management tool in 2019. This was prompted by mainly two drivers. First, employees were asking for tools to help them running their projects. Second, with a focus on organizational growth and bigger projects that involved more people, Tidal Basin wanted to reduce its risk exposure and increase the efficiency of project delivery. This way, the compa...

SAP Draws a Perimeter around Agentic AI and What That Means for the Rest of US

The most consequential enterprise AI governance document published this year arrived in late April with surprisingly little fanfare. SAP's updated API Policy, version 4/2026 , is a short document in plain English. The clause that is most interesting is Section 2.2.2. It restricts how autonomous and generative AI systems are permitted to interact with SAP APIs. Read literally, it has the potential to change the architecture of agentic AI projects across every SAP customer landscape. Read carefully, it is also more interesting than the lock-in headlines suggest. The policy targets a specific category of AI behavior, not AI as such. It connects to commercial mechanics that go well beyond API stability. And the literal text, in its current form, will probably not survive the next two policy revisions intact. There is a lot to unpack. I will walk through what the policy actually says, how the SAP-watching community is reading it, what the rest of the major enterprise vendors are doin...

Beyond GDPR: Is MyTerms the New Standard for Enforceable Personal Data Agreements?

The news IEEE just released standard 7012-2025 for machine readable personal privacy terms , nicknamed MyTerms. MyTerms covers interactions and agreements between individuals and service providers they interact with on a network. It defines a way for personal privacy requirements to be expressed as standard-form contractual agreements.  MyTerms is intended to replace today’s “notice and consent” pattern with a standardized, machine-readable contract handshake between an individual and a service provider. The standard considers individuals true first parties who can proffer privacy terms as contractual terms, typically through an automated agent acting on their behalf. The system relies on a neutral, non-business entity that hosts a bounded set of standard-form privacy agreements. These agreements are designed to be understandable and usable in practice by humans and by machines. They must be available in plain-language human-readable form, maintain legally meaningful wording, and a...

The Illusion of Value: Why Salesforce’s Agentic Work Unit is the New "Bad Query" of the AI Era

The News On February. 25, 2026, Salesforce announced a pricing and metrics update . During the company’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call, CEO Marc Benio ff, together with CMO Patrick Stokes , unveiled the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). Positioned as a metric to quantify the labor performed by autonomous digital systems, Salesforce defines an AWU as one discrete task accomplished by an AI agent. According to Salesforce, this discrete task represents the exact moment " raw intelligence is converted into real work ". It is not a fixed unit but measured as a processed prompt, a completed reasoning chain, or an invoked tool. Salesforce explicitly designed the AWU to move the industry conversation away from the raw consumption of Large Language Model (LLM) tokens. As Benioff noted, tokens only measure "how much an AI talks," whereas the AWU is intended to measure actual business execution. The scale of this rollout is massive. Salesforce reported that its platform has already processe...

LLM Showdown: Comparing ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok for Automated News Research

The analyst’s day is full of research. Now, this is the age of AI and AI is here to help, isn’t it? As everyone is talking about copilots and AI agents, why not using the tools at hand to do a little research on research. NB., no one really has a good definition of an AI agent, so this might become an additional topic for research. But I digress. Imagine the following project at hand, which is not only interesting for analysts, btw, but also for a variety of roles in the corporate world. Let’s call it vendor (competitor) monitoring. The job is the following: Research reputable sites for news about a number of vendors, relating to a set of keywords. Reputable sites are high quality news sites, high quality tech publications, high quality analyst sites and, of course the news pages of the vendors in question. Limit the time frame of the search matching to the cadence of my information requirement, e.g., “yesterday” for a daily update or “last week” for a weekly update. Provide a summary ...